EGOLDSv4
Sign in
Back to thesis page
Oracle Debate · kpqpf_hv3k01
FARTCOIN

FARTCOIN

longExpired · Neutral

Published 47d ago · conviction 74/100 · live mark $0.14601 (-2.85% / 24h)

Bull vs Bear verdict
Bull case
78
Bull dominant
margin 32 pts
Bear case
46
63%
37%

Direction-aligned thesis. The winning bull case agrees with the published direction (long) — internal coherence is high.

Bull case
Winner
  1. 14h ADX confirms trend strength.
  2. 21h ADX confirms trend strength.
  3. 3Replay supports the live regime read.
  4. 4Candidate quality is 95.1 and the desk still classifies the setup as ready for publication.
  5. 5BOLLINGER REVERSAL replay (exact regime) scored 21.0, returned 11.36%, win rate 100.0%.
  6. 6FredAI keeps the setup on watch. BOLLINGER REVERSAL is still graded C and warming. Policy confidence 68.9.
Bear case
  1. 1ADX is near 27.0, so trend force is present but follow-through still needs monitoring.
  2. 2The stop band sits near $0.2000, and any failure to move cleanly away from entry should be treated as an early warning.
  3. 3Model risk fallback used after: scheduler fast path.
Trade setup
Conviction
74/100
Entry low
$0.2067
Entry high
$0.2092
Target 1
$0.2178
Target 2
$0.2239
Stop loss
$0.2000
R:R
2.0:1
Timeframe
1-3d
Expires
2026-04-19
Current mark
$0.14601
Technical analysis · 4h
Open in Chart Lab
Trend · bearishMomentum · neutralVolatility · highSMA · death crossMACD · bullish_cross
RSI 14
42.7
Bearish
ADX 14
44.3
Very strong trend
ATR 14
0.0100
6.84% of price
Bollinger 20 · 2σ
Upper 0.1600
Lower 0.1400
inside
SMA stack
200.1500
500.1600
2000.2000
Outcome
Realized PnL
+0.36%
Peak run
+4.64%
Max adverse
+0.36%
Expired · Neutral
Drill into the call
FARTCOIN chart + overlayFull thesis · market snapshotAll FARTCOIN theses
How the Oracle Debate works

For every published thesis, EGOLDS independently constructs the strongest bull case and the strongest bear case — both adversarial, both fully data-driven from TA + funding + sentiment + on-chain context. The two cases are scored on argument quality, then a risk layer approves or kills the trade before publication. You see both sides before placing any size. No hidden agenda, no one-sided pitch.