Back to thesis page
Oracle Debate · oo9o0_6f6ank
SUI
longExpired · NeutralPublished 99d ago · conviction 68/100 · live mark $0.73381 (+1.13% / 24h)
Bull vs Bear verdict
Bull case
63
Bull leans
margin 17 pts
Bear case
46
58%
42%
Direction-aligned thesis. The winning bull case agrees with the published direction (long) — internal coherence is high.
Bull case
Winner- 1RSI 62.2 is elevated; pullback risk, not a standalone short
- 2Price above SMA20
- 3SMA20 above SMA50
- 4Candidate score 62.4 with promotion state watch.
- 5RSI_PULLBACK replay (exact_regime) scored 14.5, returned 4.46%, win rate 100.0%.
- 6FredAI allows the setup, but size should stay conservative. RSI_PULLBACK is still graded C and warming. Policy confidence 47.0.
Bear case
- 1ADX 24.1 means follow-through must be monitored; weak trend can chop the setup.
- 2Stop invalidates at $0.9100; failure to move away from entry should be treated as warning.
- 3Model risk fallback used after: scheduler fast path
Trade setup
Conviction
68/100
Entry low
$0.9318
Entry high
$0.9428
Target 1
$0.9678
Target 2
$0.9864
Stop loss
$0.9100
R:R
1.8:1
Timeframe
1-3d
Expires
2026-04-12
Current mark
$0.73381
SUI · 1h candles · last 121
Entry / Target / Stop overlaidTechnical analysis · 4h
Open in Chart Lab Trend · neutralMomentum · neutralVolatility · normalSMA · golden cross
RSI 14
44.1
Bearish
ADX 14
12.1
No trend / chop
ATR 14
0.0100
1.36% of price
Bollinger 20 · 2σ
Upper 0.7600
Lower 0.7300
inside
SMA stack
200.7400
500.7400
2000.7300
Outcome
Realized PnL
-0.71%
Peak run
+2.54%
Max adverse
-1.35%
Expired · Neutral
Drill into the call
How the Oracle Debate works
For every published thesis, EGOLDS independently constructs the strongest bull case and the strongest bear case — both adversarial, both fully data-driven from TA + funding + sentiment + on-chain context. The two cases are scored on argument quality, then a risk layer approves or kills the trade before publication. You see both sides before placing any size. No hidden agenda, no one-sided pitch.