EGOLDSv4
Sign in
Back to thesis page
Oracle Debate · f3lsk_oeqzyf
TIA

TIA

shortExpired · Neutral

Published 98d ago · conviction 67/100 · live mark $0.35584 (-6.88% / 24h)

Bull vs Bear verdict
Bull case
46
Bear leans
margin 14 pts
Bear case
60
43%
57%

Direction-aligned thesis. The winning bear case agrees with the published direction (short) — internal coherence is high.

Bull case
  1. 1ADX 25.5 means follow-through must be monitored; weak trend can chop the setup.
  2. 2Stop invalidates at $0.3100; failure to move away from entry should be treated as warning.
  3. 3This setup is running in provisional posture, so size should stay smaller and the thesis should decay faster if momentum stalls.
Bear case
Winner
  1. 1Price above SMA20
  2. 2Price below SMA200
  3. 3TA trend bullish
  4. 4Candidate score 58.0 with promotion state cooldown.
  5. 5RSI_PULLBACK replay (latest_asset) scored 15.9, returned 9.49%, win rate 100.0%.
  6. 6FredAI allows the setup, but size should stay conservative. RSI_PULLBACK is still graded C and warming. Policy confidence 43.9.
Trade setup
Conviction
67/100
Entry low
$0.3029
Entry high
$0.3053
Target 1
$0.2968
Target 2
$0.2923
Stop loss
$0.3100
R:R
2.0:1
Timeframe
1-3d
Expires
2026-04-13
Current mark
$0.35584
TIA · 1h candles · last 121
Entry / Target / Stop overlaid
0.43010.3940.35790.32180.28570.3567/13 20:007/15 02:007/16 08:007/17 14:007/18 20:00
Technical analysis · 4h
Open in Chart Lab
Trend · bearishMomentum · oversoldVolatility · highSMA · golden cross
RSI 14
27.5
Oversold
ADX 14
25.6
Trending
ATR 14
0.0100
2.81% of price
Bollinger 20 · 2σ
Upper 0.4200
Lower 0.3400
inside
SMA stack
200.3800
500.4000
2000.3900
PatternsBullish HaramiBullish Marubozu
Outcome
Realized PnL
-1.45%
Peak run
+0.38%
Max adverse
-1.78%
Expired · Neutral
Drill into the call
TIA chart + overlayFull thesis · market snapshotAll TIA theses
How the Oracle Debate works

For every published thesis, EGOLDS independently constructs the strongest bull case and the strongest bear case — both adversarial, both fully data-driven from TA + funding + sentiment + on-chain context. The two cases are scored on argument quality, then a risk layer approves or kills the trade before publication. You see both sides before placing any size. No hidden agenda, no one-sided pitch.