EGOLDSv4
Sign in
Back to thesis page
Oracle Debate · 2742x_8jizh9
KAITO

KAITO

longClosed · Loss

Published 91d ago · conviction 74/100 · live mark $0.82788 (-3.62% / 24h)

Bull vs Bear verdict
Bull case
78
Bull dominant
margin 32 pts
Bear case
46
63%
37%

Direction-aligned thesis. The winning bull case agrees with the published direction (long) — internal coherence is high.

Bull case
Winner
  1. 14h ADX confirms trend strength.
  2. 21d ADX confirms trend strength.
  3. 31h ADX confirms trend strength.
  4. 4Candidate quality is 109.4 and the desk still classifies the setup as ready for publication.
  5. 5EMA PULLBACK replay (latest asset) scored 32.6, returned 24.83%, win rate 100.0%.
  6. 6FredAI promotes this setup. EMA PULLBACK is graded B in current memory. Policy confidence 99.7.
Bear case
  1. 1ADX is near 37.2, so trend force is present but follow-through still needs monitoring.
  2. 2The stop band sits near $0.4700, and any failure to move cleanly away from entry should be treated as an early warning.
  3. 3Model risk fallback used after: scheduler fast path.
Trade setup
Conviction
74/100
Entry low
$0.4728
Entry high
$0.4742
Target 1
$0.4778
Target 2
$0.4805
Stop loss
$0.4700
R:R
2.0:1
Timeframe
1-3d
Expires
2026-04-21
Current mark
$0.82788
KAITO · 1h candles · last 121
Entry / Target / Stop overlaid
0.96770.83730.7070.57660.44630.82787/13 20:007/15 02:007/16 08:007/17 14:007/18 20:00
Technical analysis · 4h
Open in Chart Lab
Trend · bullishMomentum · neutralVolatility · highSMA · golden cross
RSI 14
55.4
Bullish
ADX 14
29.8
Trending
ATR 14
0.0400
4.83% of price
Bollinger 20 · 2σ
Upper 0.9100
Lower 0.7200
inside
SMA stack
200.8200
500.7400
2000.5900
Outcome
Realized PnL
-1.24%
Peak run
+0.27%
Max adverse
-1.24%
Closed · Loss
Drill into the call
KAITO chart + overlayFull thesis · market snapshotAll KAITO theses
How the Oracle Debate works

For every published thesis, EGOLDS independently constructs the strongest bull case and the strongest bear case — both adversarial, both fully data-driven from TA + funding + sentiment + on-chain context. The two cases are scored on argument quality, then a risk layer approves or kills the trade before publication. You see both sides before placing any size. No hidden agenda, no one-sided pitch.