EGOLDSv4
Sign in
Back to thesis page
Oracle Debate · 196da_orf8mh
BLUR

BLUR

longExpired · Neutral

Published 42d ago · conviction 74/100 · live mark $0.02005 (-3.56% / 24h)

Bull vs Bear verdict
Bull case
78
Bull dominant
margin 32 pts
Bear case
46
63%
37%

Direction-aligned thesis. The winning bull case agrees with the published direction (long) — internal coherence is high.

Bull case
Winner
  1. 14h ADX confirms trend strength.
  2. 21d ADX confirms trend strength.
  3. 31h ADX confirms trend strength.
  4. 4Candidate quality is 117.0 and the desk still classifies the setup as ready for publication.
  5. 5VOLUME TREND replay (latest asset) scored 34.3, returned 41.68%, win rate 50.0%.
  6. 6FredAI promotes this setup. RSI TREND REENTRY is graded B in current memory. Policy confidence 84.3.
Bear case
  1. 1ADX is near 68.8, so trend force is present but follow-through still needs monitoring.
  2. 2The stop band sits near $0.0300, and any failure to move cleanly away from entry should be treated as an early warning.
  3. 3ATR missing; using Bollinger range as volatility proxy.
Trade setup
Conviction
74/100
Entry low
$0.0306
Entry high
$0.0310
Target 1
$0.0318
Target 2
$0.0324
Stop loss
$0.0300
R:R
2.0:1
Timeframe
1-3d
Expires
2026-04-24
Current mark
$0.02005
BLUR · 1h candles · last 121
Entry / Target / Stop overlaid
0.03310.02940.02570.02210.01840.01975/29 01:005/30 07:005/31 13:006/1 19:006/3 01:00
Technical analysis · 4h
Open in Chart Lab
Trend · bearishMomentum · neutralVolatility · highSMA · death cross
RSI 14
35.9
Bearish
ADX 14
18.8
Weak trend
ATR 14
0.000000
0.00% of price
Bollinger 20 · 2σ
Upper 0.0200
Lower 0.0200
inside
SMA stack
200.0200
500.0200
2000.0200
PatternsBullish HaramiBullish Marubozu
Outcome
Realized PnL
+1.08%
Peak run
+1.27%
Max adverse
-0.36%
Expired · Neutral
Drill into the call
BLUR chart + overlayFull thesis · market snapshotAll BLUR theses
How the Oracle Debate works

For every published thesis, EGOLDS independently constructs the strongest bull case and the strongest bear case — both adversarial, both fully data-driven from TA + funding + sentiment + on-chain context. The two cases are scored on argument quality, then a risk layer approves or kills the trade before publication. You see both sides before placing any size. No hidden agenda, no one-sided pitch.