EGOLDSv4
Sign in
Back to thesis page
Oracle Debate · ljzqy_701zzo
FARTCOIN

FARTCOIN

shortClosed · Win

Published 45d ago · conviction 74/100 · live mark $0.13328 (-0.90% / 24h)

Bull vs Bear verdict
Bull case
25
Bear dominant
margin 53 pts
Bear case
78
24%
76%

Direction-aligned thesis. The winning bear case agrees with the published direction (short) — internal coherence is high.

Bull case
  1. 1ADX is near 44.2, so trend force is present but follow-through still needs monitoring.
  2. 2The stop band sits near $0.1500, and any failure to move cleanly away from entry should be treated as an early warning.
  3. 3Model risk fallback used after: scheduler fast path.
Bear case
Winner
  1. 11d ADX confirms trend strength.
  2. 24h ADX confirms trend strength.
  3. 31h ADX confirms trend strength.
  4. 4Candidate quality is 85.1 and the desk still classifies the setup as ready for publication.
  5. 5SMA CROSS replay (latest asset) scored 18.8, returned 23.36%, win rate 100.0%.
  6. 6FredAI keeps the setup on watch. MACD MOMENTUM is still graded C and warming. Policy confidence 58.3.
Trade setup
Conviction
74/100
Entry low
$0.1440
Entry high
$0.1457
Target 1
$0.1384
Target 2
$0.1345
Stop loss
$0.1500
R:R
2.0:1
Timeframe
1-3d
Expires
2026-06-06
Current mark
$0.13328
FARTCOIN · 1h candles · last 121
Entry / Target / Stop overlaid
0.15920.15080.14240.1340.12560.13547/14 02:007/15 08:007/16 14:007/17 20:007/19 02:00
Technical analysis · 4h
Open in Chart Lab
Trend · bearishMomentum · neutralVolatility · highSMA · golden crossMACD · bullish_cross
RSI 14
45.8
Neutral
ADX 14
20.3
Weak trend
ATR 14
0.000000
0.00% of price
Bollinger 20 · 2σ
Upper 0.1500
Lower 0.1200
inside
SMA stack
200.1400
500.1400
2000.1400
Outcome
Realized PnL
+7.15%
Peak run
+7.65%
Max adverse
+0.48%
Closed · Win
How the Oracle Debate works

For every published thesis, EGOLDS independently constructs the strongest bull case and the strongest bear case — both adversarial, both fully data-driven from TA + funding + sentiment + on-chain context. The two cases are scored on argument quality, then a risk layer approves or kills the trade before publication. You see both sides before placing any size. No hidden agenda, no one-sided pitch.